High School Cricket Math Question Stumps the Internet
Many HSC students, the equivalent of high schoolers, in Australia were stumped by several tough questions included in this week's standard mathematics exam, News Australia reports.
One task, in particular, got the internet talking due to the phrasing of the question and the general lack of a consensus on the correct answer, once it had been posted online.
The problem in question related to chirping crickets and temperature readings. Take a look at the exam task that prompted several memes below:
The examination paper, which included a box plot of temperature data, asked students to "calculate the number of chirps expected in a 15-second interval when the temperature is 19° Celsius (66.20 °F). Give your answer correct to the nearest whole number."
The reaction on social media was unsurprisingly loud.
The memes were inevitable.
i never have to do another HSC maths exam ever again pic.twitter.com/DGgevmbfzv— ?･ﾟ: * ? * : ･ﾟ? (@kaninbun) October 26, 2020
A backlash followed, which was partly caused by the fact that the examining board, NESA, placed several of the same difficult questions in the higher and lower levels of the exam.
Following said backlash, a NESA spokeswoman told News Australia it had received feedback regarding the crickets question.
"NESA confirms that all questions asked within the Maths Standard 2 exam were within the scope of the syllabus," the spokeswoman said.
Oak Ukritnukun, Matrix Education's head of mathematics, who admitted the question was "really challenging," told the Daily Mail that "you need to do quite a few things right to get full marks."
"Focus should be placed on first identifying the median, then the mean temperature," he continued. "After that calculate the mean number of chirps and the value of B. You then use the value of Y to determine the number of chirps, which as a whole number gives you an answer of 29."
What do you think? Was the question too difficult, or did you get 29 in only a small matter of time?
Researchers at the University of Tokyo fitted robotic eyes on a golf cart - to reduce accidents by self-driving vehicles. Did it work?